Thursday, September 10, 2026

Homily: The Fifteenth Sunday after Pentecost [September 6, 2026] St. James, Newport Beach

I’m happy to be back with you at St. James this morning. I have just finished a stretch serving as priest in charge at All Saints, Beverly Hills. Hey, somebody had to be there! Actually, I enjoyed my time at All Saints very much, though regular commuting from Santa Clarita to West Los Angeles almost did me in. 

My wife Kathy will tell you that I harbor some bizarre pet peeves, the strangest of which is a kind of righteous anger provoked every time the Postal Service raises the cost of a stamp by just one cent. In the 1990s and early 2000s there was a streak of one cent stamp raises, and (in those days before we all paid bills electronically) year after year I would have to stand in line at the post office merely to buy a sheet of one cent stamps. Why didn’t they just raise postage a nickel at a time and leave us alone for a few years? This whole thing really rotted my socks. I would come home from my 90 minutes at the post office muttering expletives questioning the parentage and legitimacy of the US government in general and the postal service staff in particular.

            As luck would have it, my first public appearance at Washington National Cathedral in 2012 was for the unveiling of that year’s Christmas stamp. They set up a press event downstairs in Bethlehem Chapel, and the two speakers were the US Postmaster General (the Honorable Patrick R. Donahoe, you can look him up) and me. As the Postmaster General and I waited in the cathedral’s vesting room for the event to begin, I realized that I had been given a once in a lifetime opportunity to press my case. It was time to speak truth to power! So after a bit of chitchat, I turned to Mr. Donahoe and said, “I’d like to speak to you, sir, about these one cent postage raises. They’re really inconvenient. Every year I have to go to the post office and wait in line for over an hour. Can’t you raise them less frequently, a few more cents at a time?”

            I wish I had a video of the way the Postmaster General’s face changed. The light suddenly went out in his eyes. You could see from the look on his face that I had gone in his estimation from ecclesiastical dignitary to dangerous weirdo. The conversation suddenly ended when he remembered there was a phone call he needed to make. It was probably to security or his therapist.

            I came to realize that trying to tell the Postmaster General how to run his agency was a bit like what the British call “teaching the Queen to suck eggs”. He’s the expert; you’re the novice. In the same way, I feel a little sheepish today talking to this parish about reconciliation and forgiveness. St. James’s experience of congregational exile and return has taught you lessons that no sermon can impart. I know: I walked with Cindy through a good bit of it. Nevertheless, today’s Gospel asks us to consider how we handle the wounds we inflict on each other, especially in the church. So I approach this Gospel understanding that you are the experts and I the novice.

            It’s clear from the context that, in today’s reading, Jesus is talking about conflict within the church, but the process he outlines will serve for other relationships as well. If someone offends you, take it to them in person. If that works, great. If not, bring a couple of others along and try it again. If that doesn’t work, set the conflict before the whole church. So the steps are: one-on-one, small group, whole church. It’s important to remember that the church Jesus was describing was probably the size of a house church, a couple of dozen people. Nevertheless, his point is clear: try to resolve things personally before you take it to Facebook.

            I haven’t been involved in a lot of church conflict in my working life, but a few years ago I ran afoul of a particularly toxic group of young clergy who call themselves “Weird Anglican Twitter”. They’re essentially Gen Z Anglo-Catholic Socialists who blame people like me for the decline of the Episcopal Church. We Baby Boomers, they say, ruined Christianity by making it more inclusive and less rigid. They want a church that is socially progressive and theologically conservative, kind of like Bernie Sanders meets Franklin Graham. People like me really seem to annoy them.

            So because I had been vocal about social issues during my time in Washington, my friend the author Diana Butler Bass and I suddenly found ourselves the joint objects of their scorn, enduring endless daily personal attacks on Twitter. Diana and I solved the problem by figuring out who their bishops were and contacting them directly. To their credit, the several bishops admonished these weird Anglicans by reminding of them of Jesus’s advice in today’s Gospel. Before you go public, try to work things out in private. In any event, cool it with social media.

            When we read today’s Gospel, we often forget the larger point that Jesus is making here, and this has relevance for our lives at home, at work, and in society at large. Justice is not necessarily everybody getting what they consider fair. Justice is about restoring the community for the good of the whole. Restorative justice is just that: it restores relationships. We live in a litigious age, and we tend to think of conflicts being resolved by lawsuits with compensatory damages. But the church, the family, and the neighborhood are not boxing rings. They are covenanted communities, and the highest good is not winning but the healing and restoration of the living organism of the church, the household, the city or state.

            Because we live in a time of escalating use of social media, it is tempting to bring our beefs to the internet before we talk to the person who we believe has wronged us. It is now customary not actually to resolve conflicts but to heap shame on those who offend us or, perhaps worse, to paper over unresolved issues with polite fictions. A seminary ethics professor I know used to assign Emily Post’s book of etiquette as one of her required texts. When I asked her why, she said, “In the Episcopal Church, what people call ethics is usually just etiquette.” We revert to polite Episcopalian behavior and thus often protect those who can inflict serious harm. It is not polite to call out bad behavior, so often we look the other way.

            As in my encounter with the Postmaster General, so in today’s sermon I don’t want to presume to tell a group of people who have had to call out bad behavior and go to the church for restorative justice how to resolve your personal and community conflicts. But I do want to express my gratitude that in Jesus, we follow one who values us enough not only to tell us the truth but who calls us to find a gracious way to tell the truth to others. In our Baptismal vows we all promise to “respect the dignity of every human being”. One way we respect each other’s dignity is to tell hard and sometimes difficult truths. The good news this morning is that we live in a universe in which families and churches and even societies can be torn asunder and still find a way to come together in a just reconciliation and thrive. Being right is at best a momentary high. Being reconciled is a sign of the blessed and abundant life into which Jesus calls us. And abundant life is what our being together with Jesus is all about. Amen

 

Homily: The Thirteenth Sunday after Pentecost [August 23, 2026] Calvary Church, Stonington CT

 

            The invitation to preach in such a literary hotbed as Stonington reminds me of a conversation I recently had with another retired priest friend of mine about the use of literature in sermons. “In our day,” he said, “a sermon had three points and a quote from T.S. Eliot. Today it’s two points and a quote from Mary Oliver.” I’m afraid he’s right, though I worry that by the time I sit helpless in the nursing home chapel it will be one point and a quote from Amanda Gorman.

            You’re in luck this morning. I do not come armed with arcane literary ammo, though I suppose I could find a few dystopian quotes to buttress my observations about the state of things both in nature and the nation. I live in California, and the heat there this summer has been apocalyptic. And I’m not taking political sides when I say that the state of our nation and world is perilous. Ecologically and politically, we are a mess. And starting with an acknowledgment of that plain fact gives us a way in to understanding our Gospel for this morning.

            The world in which Jesus lived, taught, and healed was one dominated by national and local oppression. Rome occupied Jewish Palestine, and they took so much money and food to support their standing army that the people were always broke and hungry. One of the main aims of Jesus’s ministry was to show how we survive in a time of scarcity. Our normal human tendency is to hoard what we have. In feeding the multitudes, Jesus shows that we thrive in bleak times by making common cause with each other.

            Things were bad for Palestinian Jews in Jesus’s time, and those perceived as troublemakers lived in constant jeopardy. That is perhaps why Jesus takes his companions today to the far north of Israel, Caesarea Philippi—about as far away as you could get from Jerusalem—to query them about the word on the street about him. [Matthew 16:13-20].  “Who do people say that the Son of Man is?” Note the guarded nature of this question. He’s asking about himself in the third person, just in case someone might be eavesdropping.

            And note the answers his disciples give him. They don’t say, “Jesus the healer” or “Jesus the teacher”. They reply, “Some say John the Baptist, but others Elijah, and still others Jeremiah or one of the prophets”. Biblical prophets were considered dangerous people, and the disciples’ oblique answer to Jesus’s circuitous question adds up to an admission that, yes, people think you’re a troublemaker.  One of my lifelong mentors, an Old Testament scholar, used to say that the role of the prophet in Israel was not to predict the future nor to call out injustice but simply to tell the truth about the ways things are.  In his words, “The prophet sees reality and verbalizes it.”

            Like Isaiah and Jeremiah before him, Jesus describes the world as it is and tells the truth about it—always a dangerous business in combustible times.

            When Jesus turns from the word on the street to the word in the group, Peter blurts out, “You are the Messiah, the son of the living God.” In their centuries living under various forms of exile and oppression, the Jews had developed the expectation that a Messiah, an anointed king like David, would come to lead them out of their current mess into a time of stability and peace. This was both a religious and a political hope. Peter and his friends had come to believe that there was more to Jesus than his miracles and parables. They hoped he would be the king who would finally throw the Romans out.

            It is easy to see why first century Palestinian Jews, living under Roman rule, would long for a miraculous figure to overthrow the bad guys and bring things back to the glory days. It is easy to see why some of us, 21st century Americans, would hope for a magical benign leader to take us out of political darkness and environmental catastrophe.  But, two thousand years on, we have to admit that a Messianic hope is pretty much still just that—only a hope.  No Davidic king has come back to restore Israel, and if Jesus was the Messiah, then he exercised his kingly authority in radically unexpected ways.  If anything, Jesus was an anti-king, dying between two thieves in the Roman manner usually reserved for revolutionaries. The earliest Christians believed that Caesar did not exercise true authority. Jesus did. And his authority was based on something other than brute power.

            So far in this passage, we have learned that Jesus is a truth-teller and the opposite of a king. Now we come to what is for me the most interesting thing that Jesus says to Peter:

And I tell you, you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church, and the gates of Hades will not prevail against it. I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven, and whatever you bind on earth will be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth will be loosed in heaven.

 

            By giving Simon the new name “Peter”, which means “rock” in almost every language but English, Jesus is making a pun. “You are ‘Rocky’, and I’m building my church on you.” And then he says the curious stuff about the keys of the kingdom and binding things on earth and in heaven.

            It is easy to glimpse the hand of a later editor in language that buttresses the power of the church with talk of keys, rocks, binding, and loosing. It is entirely likely that well-meaning scribes put institutional commercials into Jesus’s mouth, especially about Peter and his papal successors having a lock on the kingdom of God. But it’s the line about binding and loosing that seems most authentic to me. “Whatever you bind on earth will be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth will be loosed in heaven.”

            The institutional church (which I represent) has long taken this binding/loosing language to refer to the absolution of sins. But note that the Gospel text does not actually refer to sins as such. In fact, the two Greek words Matthew uses here 

Δέω and λύω mean, respectively, “imprisoned” and “set free”. This moment of Messianic transfer is about much more than institutional prerogatives. It is about the true gift of liberation we know in Jesus. In this act of bestowing, Jesus sets us free from whatever it is that binds us: our guilt, our remorse, our pain, sometimes simply ourselves. We all walk around carrying so much weight from the past. Jesus now sets us free from everything that ties us up in emotional knots. 

            And not only us. Jesus’s gift to Peter and the community he creates is the power of liberation for everyone. You and I, as Jesus’s companions and the members of the body of Christ in the world, now have the power to bind and loose, to defeat all the forces that seek to imprison human beings and the creation. In today’s Romans reading, Paul calls us the body of Christ. He means that literally, not figuratively. You and I, together, are Jesus in the here and now. We have the authority to set free ourselves and all who suffer under various kinds of oppression, degradation, and confinement. In this moment Jesus makes us all agents of personal and social liberation.

            Who did they say Jesus was? He was a prophet, one who told the truth about the way things are. He was also one who gathered around him a group who would continue his work long after his death and resurrection. You and I are members of that group, and we have been given the authority to liberate each other and the world from all the hateful, tyrannous forces that imprison us. And if Jesus is the Messiah, a kind of anti-king who knows human suffering in its very depths, then you and I are the ones who, know that suffering ourselves, have been empowered to heal people and set them free. 

            As much as we all hope for a mythical magic superhero like Odysseus or Spiderman to come from the clouds to save us, the good news this morning is this: you and I have been given each other and the authority to set ourselves free. Our job, as Jesus’s present-day companions, is to take this authority and use it to love each other, ourselves, and those who suffer because of the cruelty and sin that will continue to persist in our world. You and I, together, as the body of Christ in the world, are the Messiah we hope for. We have been given the keys to fling open the prison doors. Let us use them to set ourselves, each other, and the world free from the forces that will always finally fail in their futile attempts to bind us and those we love. Amen.