Over
the course of my life I have read George Orwell’s classic novel, Nineteen Eighty-Four, on four widely
separate occasions. I first read it in 1964, my sophomore year in high school,
for a book report. I next read it in 1984 because, well, it was 1984. I then
read it after September 11, 2001 when the president and congress passed the
Patriot Act and questions of terrorism and civil liberties were so prevalent.
And I read it again recently because of all the assaults on truth and language
we seem to be undergoing. Somehow today, the idea of a leader insisting that 2
+ 2 = 5 doesn’t seem quite as farfetched as it once did.
Every
time you read a great book something new emerges for you. In high school I was
particularly taken with George Orwell’s inventions of doublethink and the
Thought Police. In the Reagan years I focused on the way allies and enemies
kept changing places. In the Bush-Cheney era, with its continual assaults on
language, George Orwell’s coining of the language called Newspeak (in which
euphemisms abound) seemed most important. This time, something unexpected
caught my eye.
If
you remember the plot of Nineteen
Eighty-Four, you will remember that its protagonist, Winston Smith, is
detained by the Thought Police and interrogated by a man known only as O’Brien.
Smith has been found to have been harboring negative thoughts about Big
Brother. Early on in their dialogue, Smith admits hating Big Brother. O’Brien
says in reply,
You hate him. Good. Then the time has come for you to take the last step. You must love Big Brother. It is not enough to obey him: you must love him.
What ensues, of course, is one of
the most horrific episodes of brainwashing ever recorded. O’Brien finds the way
in to Winston Smith’s deepest fears and gets him to betray the woman he loves.
As the novel ends, Winston Smith’s mind has been changed. Here is how George
Orwell describes Smith’s final epiphany:
He gazed up at the enormous face.
Forty years it had taken him to learn what kind of smile was hidden beneath the
dark moustache. O cruel, needless misunderstanding! O stubborn, self-willed
exile from the loving breast! Two gin-scented tears trickled down the sides of
his nose. But it was all right, everything was all right, the struggle was
finished. He had won the victory over himself. He loved Big Brother.
Now
I will resist the temptation to make the obvious connection between Big Brother
and other possible large national leaders we might think of who seem to exact
loyalty in exchange for absolutely nothing. Instead, what struck me on this
rereading of Nineteen Eighty-Four was
its ironic connection to this morning’s gospel (John 15:9-17):
As the Father has loved
me, so I have loved you; abide in my love. If you keep my commandments, you
will abide in my love, just as I have kept my Father’s commandments and abide
in his love.
This
is my commandment, that you love one another as I have loved you. I am giving
you these commands so that you may love one another.
There
are many things we might say about Jesus, but first among them today is that
John’s gospel portrays him as the ultimate anti-Big Brother. On Maundy Thursday
Jesus washes the disciples’ feet but does not ask that they wash his in return.
Last week we heard Jesus describe himself as the vine and us as the branches.
Today we hear Jesus commanding us to love one another. Big Brother demands that
we love him. Jesus commands not that we love him but that we love one another.
George
Orwell’s Big Brother is not the first (and will certainly not be the last)
leader in human history to demand love from his subjects. The political world
in which Jesus lived and taught was dominated by Rome, whose official state
cult made the emperor a god. In our social lives we have become habituated to
dealing with leaders (usually political and religious authorities, sometimes
even our bosses) who demand something more than mere loyalty: they demand
personal adoration. These encounters begin with the transactional (“I will keep
you safe and you will pay your taxes”) and then morph into the relational (“I
give your life meaning and you will love me”). This slow creep from covenant to
worship is one reason I have increasingly come to distrust charisma. There’s
always a hidden price to pay. There’s always a dark side.
But
none of this is true for Jesus. To be sure, he does talk in the gospel reading about
laying down his life for his friends, but even there he does not move to the
obvious and logical Tony Soprano conclusion, “so you owe me big time”. Jesus refers to his self-offering as an
example of the depth of his love. And what he asks in return is neither
obedience nor worship. What he asks in return is that we love one another as he
has loved us.
I
think one of the reasons we spend not one day but fifty days celebrating Easter
is that it takes a long time to take in just how countercultural the
resurrection really is. I spent the last years of my professional life in
Washington D.C., and I think one of the reasons Americans distrust our capital
city is because it encapsulates all the worst transactional values of American
culture. All relationships there are based on power and obligation. When I
first went to D.C., people continually asked me how, having grown up in
Hollywood, I was adjusting to Washington. “No problem,” I would say. “They’re
both the same culture.”
The
resurrection of Jesus, which we celebrate in these fifty days of Easter, is the
ultimate rebuke to a culture of power and obligation. Big Brother and Caesar
demand unthinking obedience and fawning love. Jesus and the God he incarnates
ask only that we love one another. The values of power and obligation always
appear to be winning. The values of humility, justice, compassion, and peace
always seem to lose. But the day and season of Easter suggest the way things
really work. In George Orwell’s world, Big Brother will always prevail. In
God’s world the humility, justice, compassion, and peace made real and present
in Jesus eventually outlast the pretentious imperial forces that seek to crush
them.
In
God’s universe, it is Jesus and those who care for others who prevail. And when
all is said and done, our only obligation is to love our fellow human beings. We
love God not vertically but horizontally. And as Reinhold Niebuhr reminds us,
in the social realm, love must be more than a feeling. We love each other one
way in a family, differently in a community. For those of us who seek to love
one another socially, love must always be translated as justice.
This is my commandment, that you
love one another as I have loved you. I am giving you these commands so that
you may love one another.
As
followers of Jesus, you and I believe and hope that love and justice will
ultimate prevail. As realists, we know that we must follow Jesus in a world
dominated by the values of Caesar and Big Brother, Washington, and
Hollywood. On this Sixth Sunday of
Easter, Jesus shows us how we can make our way through all the bad values and
false loyalties that our culture tries to force upon us. We follow Jesus and
become our real selves by loving and serving each other and the world.
Every
generation that reads George Orwell’s Nineteen
Eighty-Four sees in its pages its own problems reflected back to it.
Winston Smith’s tragedy lies in the way he is persuaded to love an authority figure
instead of a fellow human being. In that novel’s world, there is tellingly no
voice of Jesus to remind anyone of the priority God places on mutual human
love.
Patriarchy,
hierarchy, and empire die hard. Even after centuries of Christian faith and
practice, we Christians persist in thinking that God is more like a jealous
emperor than a humble Palestinian Jewish peasant. After all these years, we
still seem to think that God is some kind of narcissist who, like Big Brother,
demands love without question. But if we really hear what Jesus is saying,
we’ll find that it isn’t like that at all.
This
is my commandment, that you love one another as I have loved you. I am giving
you these commands so that you may love one another.
Here
is the good news: we do not yet inhabit the world of George Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four. There is still
room for us to hear these countercultural words of Jesus. We stand against
empire whenever we choose to love people instead of power. May we continue to
hear these words and live them out in our personal and social lives, and in so
doing frustrate the narcissistic demands of all our various Big Brothers and of
all systems that would alienate us from Jesus, each other, the world, and even
ourselves. Amen.
1 comment:
www0628
mizuno running shoes
salomon shoes
polo ralph lauren
canada goose jackets
oakley sunglasses
cheap mlb jerseys
polo outlet
kd 10 elite
mulberry bags
cazal sunglasses
Post a Comment